The Vermont Supreme Court, affirming a trial court’s decision, has ruled that an insured had breached his insurance policy’s cooperation clause and that, as a result, his insurance carrier had no obligation to defend or indemnify him in connection with an underlying personal injury claim.

The Case

Charles Chandler asserted that his then-girlfriend, now-wife, Faye

Michael C. Cannata has issued an Intellectual Property Law Bulletin. We hope you find the Bulletin useful and interesting. We invite your suggestions. The Bulletin is not legal advice.

Recent Decisions by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

An acrimonious marital breakup has been known to bring out the worst in some people. Those battles increasingly are fought on the technology field, thereby leaving courts to determine complex personal rights issues in the context of grown-ups behaving badly.1

In another such case, Crocker C. v. Anne R.,2 the Supreme Court, Kings County, addressed

In a highly followed litigation (CRN and NPA filed a number of amicus briefs), United States v. Bayer Corp. (US District Court for New Jersey) the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission sought an Order holding Bayer in contempt of Court alleging that Bayer had violated the terms of a consent decree that

Court Finds Coverage For Owner As Additional Insured And Rejects Insurer’s Late Notice Argument

In October 2012, an employee of Tyco Integrated Security LLC went to a construction site to meet with the construction manager about providing security services for the project, and he allegedly tripped and fell entering a bathroom before the meeting began. 

Divorced Wife Was Not an “Eligible Spouse” Entitled to Survivor Benefits under Ex-Husband’s Pension Plan, Eleventh Circuit Rules

The plaintiff’s husband was a participant in the El Paso Corporation Pension Plan, under which he received retirement benefits beginning in 1987. The plaintiff and her husband divorced in 2011, and he died about eight months later.

After

The Supreme Court of Nebraska, in a case of first impression, has ruled that an insurance company must show prejudice to prevail on a defense based on an insured’s violation of the voluntary payment provision in a commercial general liability insurance policy – and that prejudice was shown as a matter of law where the

A federal district court in Oregon has ruled that natural resource damage (“NRD”) claims asserted by a council that included Indian Tribes as members were brought on behalf of federal or state government authorities for purposes of a pollution exclusion.

The Case

In December 2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) listed a stretch

An appellate court in Connecticut, affirming a trial court’s decision, has ruled that a homeowner’s insurance policy did not cover claims that the homeowner had misrepresented his home’s condition to a couple that purchased his home, concluding that the claim was for purely economic loss and not property damage.

The Case

Meghan and James Wishneski

A federal district court in New Jersey has ruled that “no-assignment clauses” in insurance policies precluded a company’s claim that it was insured under the policies as the successor-in-interest to an additional insured.

The Case

On July 22, 2005, Shelby Ownbey, an employee of Advantage Buildings & Exteriors, was seriously injured when he fell approximately

A Pennsylvania federal district court has ruled that a breach of contract lawsuit against an insured was not a covered “occurrence.”

The Case

Norpaco, Inc. sued Tray-Pak Corporation in a state court in Connecticut, alleging that Tray-Pak had sold it defective polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”) trays for Norpaco’s use. The complaint against Tray-Pak alleged breach of

The regulatory landscape on which pharmaceutical and medical device companies tread daily is littered with compliance landmines, none more dangerous than US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) enforcement of the misbranding provisions of the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FDCA).  It is not so much the fact of FDA’s enforcement – after all, one can

A policy memo issued on September 9, 2015 from Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates of the Department of Justice (DOJ) outlines a strategy for holding individuals in both civil and criminal enforcement actions accountable for misconduct by corporations and other business entities.  The memo was the product of a working group of senior DOJ

The Office of the Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG) released supplemental guidance in April 2015 for performing provider system (PPS) lead entities (PPS Leads) on special factors that must be taken into account, in addition to the compliance program requirements of New York Social Services Law Section 363-d and Title 18 of the New York Codes

More than 30 years ago, in 1984, a divided New York Court of Appeals decided in Barker v. Kallash that a person who committed an illegal act of a serious nature should not be able to profit from that wrongdoing.1 By 1997, the court, in Manning v. Brown, seemed to have no doubt about this