Anti-Assignment Clause Bars Doctor’s Reimbursement Claim

February 20, 2019 | Rivkin Rounds Staff | Litigation | Private Insurers

Rivkin Radler’s Employee Benefit Plan Review included a summary of a case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that an anti-assignment provision in a group health benefit plan barred direct reimbursement to an Atlanta dermatologist. The patient had executed an Assignment of Benefits in favor of the physician, a non-preferred provider under the patient’s plan, in order to have the plan pay the physician directly. A valid assignment would also have given the physician the right to sue the insurer after it allegedly underpaid the claims.

Authors
show more

Get legal updates and news delivered to your inbox