Foreign Parallel Proceedings from the United States Perspective: Do the Courts Need a Crystal Ball?

July 31, 2012 | Appeals | Complex Torts & Product Liability

Please click the link below to view Foreign Parallel Proceedings From the United States Perspective: Do the Courts Need A Crystal Ball? Adobe Reader is required to view the bulletin. If Adobe Reader is not installed on your PC, click here to download and install.

Foreign Parallel Proceedings From the United States Perspective: Do the Courts Need A Crystal Ball?

Reprinted with persmission from the US-Korea Law Review.

Share this article:

BACK TO PUBLICATIONS

ATTORNEYS

Paul V. Majkowski

Partner

Practice Groups

Appeals

Complex Torts & Product Liability

Related Publications

Five Years Later, Issues From Mallela Continue To Be Litigated
January 8 |2010

It has been almost exactly five years since the New York Court of Appeals issued its decision in State Farm...

Fierce Litigation Battles Over Range of ‘Mallela’ Issues
March 5 |2010

In State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Mallela,[1] the New York Court of Appeals held that an insurer may...

Court Rejects Claim Over Elimination of Right To Transfer Balance
February 28 |2010

The plaintiff in this case worked for Airborne Express, Inc., which was acquired by DHL Holdings (USA), Inc., now called...